Go to provider selection to start a new comparison
We have tested 10 VPS plans from ScalaHosting and TransIP. We'll show which one is best based on a detailed performance analysis, on features and prices.
ScalaHosting was founded as a VPS provider in 2007.
It is headquartered in the United States.
It employs 55 people.
It offers Managed Hosting, VPS, Web Hosting and Wordpress hosting products.
Plan Name | Monthly Price | CPU cores | Memory (GB) | Disk Space (GB) | Data Transfer (GB) | Latest trial | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BladeVPS XS | 6.99€ | 1 | 1.0 | 25 | 1000 | May 20 2024 | |
BladeVPS X2 | 14.50€ | 1 | 2.0 | 75 | 2000 | Oct 09 2023 | |
Build #1 | $24.95 | 2 | 4.0 | 50 | 3000 | May 26 2024 | |
BladeVPS X4 | 25.99€ | 2 | 4.0 | 150 | 5000 | Jan 12 2024 | |
PerformanceVPS C2 | 36.50€ | 2 | 4.0 | 100 | 5000 | Jul 04 2024 | |
Build #2 | $49.95 | 4 | 8.0 | 100 | 3000 | Jul 11 2024 | |
6 cores 12GB | $71.95 | 6 | 12.0 | 120 | 3000 | Oct 12 2024 | |
BladeVPS X8 | 67.99€ | 4 | 8.0 | 320 | 10000 | Mar 05 2024 | |
PerformanceVPS C4 | 73.50€ | 4 | 8.0 | 200 | 10000 | Nov 24 2023 | |
Build #3 | $95.95 | 8 | 16.0 | 160 | 3000 | Aug 26 2024 |
Compare specs for all plans from all providers
To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.
Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.
Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.
Screen all VPS from ScalaHosting and TransIPPlan Name | Web Perf | Raw CPU Power | Perf Stability | Disk IO Perf | Network Perf | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BladeVPS XS
6.99€ |
F | F | E | E | D | |
BladeVPS X2
14.50€ |
E | F | C | E | D | |
Build #1
$24.95 |
B | D | C | C | F | |
BladeVPS X4
25.99€ |
F | E | E | F | C | |
PerformanceVPS C2
36.50€ |
D | E | B | E | C | |
Build #2
$49.95 |
E | D | D | D | F | |
6 cores 12GB
$71.95 |
A | C | A | C | F | |
BladeVPS X8
67.99€ |
E | C | E | E | C | |
PerformanceVPS C4
73.50€ |
C | C | B | E | B | |
Build #3
$95.95 |
C | B | B | B | F |
This list is a subset of the features each provider may offer.
These are the CPUs we have seen in ScalaHosting and TransIP instances in the past 18 months.
ScalaHosting | TransIP |
---|---|
All ScalaHosting CPUs by plan | All TransIP CPUs by plan |
Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, no TSX, IBRS) Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge, IBRS) |
AMD EPYC Processor (with IBPB) Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update) Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake) |
The provider consistency score shows how much variation can be expected between 2 servers of the same type at the same provider. A high consistency score (>65) means the performance of all servers of the provider is consistent over many trials and many plans.
Providers who don't have enough data yet at VPSBenchmarks don't have a consistency score.
This is the average time it took to create an instance for ScalaHosting and TransIP from instance order to instance accepting connections.
ScalaHosting | TransIP | |
---|---|---|
Number of instance creations in sample | 13 | 6 |
Average provisioning time | 209s | 108s |
These are some of the test results that are used to determine the grades above.
We ran a database intensive web application at various levels of load on cloud servers from ScalaHosting and TransIP. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.
Local Response Time per Plan
Lower is better
We ran a database intensive web application at various levels of load on cloud servers from ScalaHosting and TransIP. This is the maximum rate of HTTP requests that each server handled without timing out.
Maximum HTTP request rate
Higher is better
We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of ScalaHosting and TransIP. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:
Rate of operations
Higher is better
We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of ScalaHosting and TransIP. These are the Sysbench Disk IO Random Read test results:
Rate of operations
Higher is better
We have performed large file transfers from the ScalaHosting and TransIP VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.
The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.
Download Speed per Plan
Higher is better
We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.
This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.
Throughput variations of the endurance test over 24 hours. The coefficient of variation is the standard deviation of the test throughput divided by its average value. Low variations mean that resources allocated to the server were stable for the duration of the test and there was little contention.
Ops/hour coefficient of variation
Lower is better
Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?
Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.
With "Private Trials", the same benchmarks that run on all VPS at vpsbenchmarks.com will run on the servers of your choice. The results are private and you will be able to compare them to any other public benchmark on this website.
Run your first Private Trial for just $4.